|
Yutrzenika
|
 |
« Reply #1455 on: October 21, 2011, 08:25:10 pm » |
|
I don't drink anyways, so meh. I could be mistaken about the price, I did look at another fancy bottle of some form of alcohol next to it, and may have gotten the prices mixed up in my head. xD
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Synaster
|
 |
« Reply #1456 on: October 21, 2011, 11:14:12 pm » |
|
You know the riddle, "What came first, the chicken or the egg?" I have solved it! If you're a smart-ass, you'd probably say "chicken" because it came first in the sentence. But push that smart-assery aside and focus on which of the two existed before the other in history to solve the riddle, and you'd find that the EGG came first. The riddle never said that it had to be a CHICKEN egg. Dinosaurs came first and they hatched from eggs long before their feathered, warm-blooded cousins came along. I haz a smart. Now I can sleep tonight. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Lash2828
|
 |
« Reply #1457 on: October 22, 2011, 01:20:10 am » |
|
You know the riddle, "What came first, the chicken or the egg?" I have solved it! If you're a smart-ass, you'd probably say "chicken" because it came first in the sentence. But push that smart-assery aside and focus on which of the two existed before the other in history to solve the riddle, and you'd find that the EGG came first. The riddle never said that it had to be a CHICKEN egg. Dinosaurs came first and they hatched from eggs long before their feathered, warm-blooded cousins came along. I haz a smart. Now I can sleep tonight.  Fish existed before Dinosaurs and they hatched from eggs, too. So your deduction is correct, but worded wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Lash, so pro that he can play TF2 on Atari."
|
|
|
|
Synaster
|
 |
« Reply #1458 on: October 22, 2011, 01:48:19 am » |
|
Yeah, yeah, I see that. "Dinosaurs came before them..." Better? lol
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Yutrzenika
|
 |
« Reply #1459 on: October 22, 2011, 01:51:45 am » |
|
Yeah, yeah, I see that. "Dinosaurs came before them..." Better? lol
Teehee. :3
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dodom
|
 |
« Reply #1460 on: October 22, 2011, 07:11:48 am » |
|
But fish eggs are so different from amniotic eggs that it's inaccurate to name them by the same word, so what do we do? WHAT DO WE DO?  ? Also the eggs came first because the chicken wasn't in the mood.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TheLastOutlaw
|
 |
« Reply #1461 on: October 22, 2011, 07:39:15 am » |
|
Dodom beat me to the horrific pun.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Visit my Deviant Art page, home of Manic Depression: The Webcomic! http://thelastoutlaw.deviantart.comMask, stapler, Machete.. The Last Outlaw: Like Jason, only more awesome, bitch.
|
|
|
|
Cheez
|
 |
« Reply #1462 on: October 23, 2011, 07:43:24 pm » |
|
You know the riddle, "What came first, the chicken or the egg?" I have solved it! If you're a smart-ass, you'd probably say "chicken" because it came first in the sentence. But push that smart-assery aside and focus on which of the two existed before the other in history to solve the riddle, and you'd find that the EGG came first. The riddle never said that it had to be a CHICKEN egg. Dinosaurs came first and they hatched from eggs long before their feathered, warm-blooded cousins came along. I haz a smart. Well.... yeah. Obviously. That got solved years ago.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Cheez is fuckin hawt with teh boobehs. Cheez is also a raptor...pirate. A raptor pirate. Playing chess. WARNING- If you send me a PM with no subject, I WILL NOT REPLY.
|
|
|
|
Synaster
|
 |
« Reply #1463 on: October 23, 2011, 10:13:23 pm » |
|
Sure, but no one told me the answer. D:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
--Pappa Cricco--
|
 |
« Reply #1464 on: October 24, 2011, 01:55:38 am » |
|
we all agreed if was for the best.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Log!
|
 |
« Reply #1465 on: October 24, 2011, 06:13:25 am » |
|
For the record, I think the implication is that the egg is a chicken egg.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
At least, that's what I think.
|
|
|
|
Dodom
|
 |
« Reply #1466 on: October 24, 2011, 06:25:01 am » |
|
The egg is a chicken in a shell, therefore the egg has no distinct existance and the chicken came first by default.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Log!
|
 |
« Reply #1467 on: October 24, 2011, 02:27:18 pm » |
|
Well, if we're talking about an actual post-egg chicken, the chicken would come first, as it would be some weird bird that isn't technically a chicken that dropped the first egg containing a chicken.
Also, is an egg defined by what it contains, or by what lays it?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
At least, that's what I think.
|
|
|
|
Dodom
|
 |
« Reply #1468 on: October 24, 2011, 03:01:26 pm » |
|
An egg is defined by its socio-economic origin and cultural background.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sok
|
 |
« Reply #1469 on: October 24, 2011, 04:04:52 pm » |
|
and genes? in a little? or does that make me a nazi?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 btw, Are the wings on fire?
|
|
|
|